<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v4.1.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Sun, 06 Jul 2008 00:12:33 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>LIC Newsletter</title><link>http://redrose.squarespace.com/lic-newsletter/</link><description></description><copyright></copyright><language>en-GB</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v4.1.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>Whom do Labour prefer as the next French President?</title><dc:creator>Technical Support</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:25:20 +0000</pubDate><link>http://redrose.squarespace.com/lic-newsletter/2006/11/29/whom-do-labour-prefer-as-the-next-french-president.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">104903:957477:790991</guid><description><![CDATA[<font size="2"><font face="Comic Sans MS"><strong>Guardian 18 Nov 2006<br /></strong>Next year&rsquo;s <span lang="en-gb">[presidential] </span>election in France will<span lang="en-gb"> </span>come down to a choice between two menus for change. </font></font><p><font face="Comic Sans MS" size="2">On the right, Sarkozy&rsquo;s neo-Thatcherite cocktail of tax<span lang="en-gb"> </span>cuts, big-bang institutional upheavals and tough law-and-order, directed at immigrants in particular. On the left,<span lang="en-gb"> </span>Royal&rsquo;s neo-Blairite concoction of economic flexibility, cultural liberalism and<span lang="en-gb"> </span>reducing social exclusion. </font></p><p><font face="Comic Sans MS" size="2">Presented with this choice,<span lang="en-gb"> </span>where do Britain&rsquo;s major<span lang="en-gb"> </span>parties stand? The Tories<span lang="en-gb"> </span>have already openly embraced Sarkozy, who returned the compliment<span lang="en-gb"> </span>when he addressed their conference last month by video link. But Sarkozy is also very much Labour&rsquo;s candidate next year. Neither<span lang="en-gb"> </span>Tony Blair nor Gordon Brown will say it publicly, but each believes that Sarkozy will win and has persuaded himself that this outcome is in Britain&rsquo;s interests. Nothing better illustrates how Labour&rsquo;s failure to understand the Bush administration has perverted its view of Europe and minimised its once hoped<span lang="en-gb"> </span>for<span lang="en-gb">&nbsp; </span>influence there. </font></p><font face="Comic Sans MS" size="2">In election after<span lang="en-gb"> </span>European election, Labour has made pro-Americanism and zest for economic liberalism the sole yardsticks of where British interests lie. They have been for Aznar against Zapatero in Spain, Merkel against Schr&ouml;der in<span lang="en-gb"> </span>Germany, Berlusconi rather than Prodi in Italy &mdash; and now Sarkozy rather than Royal in France. Sometimes, such choices may indeed be the lesser of two evils, as in the need for change from the failed Schr&ouml;der. But when the party of the left has begun to embrace modernisation and the right is led by a scoundrel, as has happened in<span lang="en-gb"> </span>Italy and France, Labour&rsquo;s moderate social-democratic interests, and Britain&rsquo;s interests in Europe, should lie decisively on the side of the<span lang="en-gb"> </span>centre-left party. Let Blair and Brown root for Sarkozy. The rest of us should embrace the most<span lang="en-gb"> </span>hopeful development in French politics for a generation. <br />&nbsp; </font><font face="Comic Sans MS" size="2"><p><font face="Comic Sans MS" size="2">martin.kettle@guardian.co.uk <br /></font></p></font>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://redrose.squarespace.com/lic-newsletter/rss-comments-entry-790991.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>